Areas of focus
Speaking topics
Algorithmic Immersion Radicalisation
The AIR framework, its testable propositions, evidence rubric and distinction between documented digital pathways and causal claims.
Digital radicalisation
Online subcultures, platform affordances, algorithmic curation and the evidential problems involved in reconstructing pathways.
Foreign interference
Information operations, proxy activity and the boundary between documented attribution, inference and unresolved investigation.
Online harms
How online environments may intersect with coercion, violent mobilisation, mental health and social strain without collapsing distinct outcomes into one theory.
Intelligence
Open-source evidence, uncertainty, warning, ethical safeguards and the limits of population-level contextual indicators.
Policing
Case classification, prevention, community legitimacy, evidence quality and responsible interpretation of online-behaviour data.
Border security
Comparative Five Eyes questions concerning screening, mobility and public safety, with safeguards against demographic profiling and ecological inference.
Democratic resilience
Trust, misinformation, polarisation, foreign influence and the institutional conditions under which public evidence is interpreted.
Tailored without changing the evidence
Audiences and formats
Presentations can be structured for researchers, students, government, police, intelligence, journalists, community organisations or a general audience. The level of technical detail may change; definitions, data boundaries and uncertainty do not.
- Research seminars and conference papers emphasise theory, measurement and reproducibility.
- Practitioner briefings emphasise operational relevance, uncertainty and ethical limits.
- Teaching sessions emphasise data literacy, comparison and causal reasoning.
- Media and public discussions emphasise clear definitions and defensible interpretation.
Scholarly boundary
What a presentation will—and will not—claim
A presentation may report an observed finding, a stated statistical association, an informed hypothesis or a methodological observation. These categories are identified rather than blended. No dashboard association is presented as proof that social context or a platform caused an individual offence.
Contact
Speaking enquiries
Please provide the organisation, audience, proposed date, location or online format, topic, intended use and expected length. No pricing or commercial booking claims are published on this research site.